Fidelity has proposed an Ethereum ETF with integrated staking rewards, aiming to enhance investor returns. The proposal has stirred market interest, notably impacting Lido DAO’s price. Yet, regulatory challenges loom, with the SEC scrutinising the complexities introduced by staking in the ETF structure.

Fidelity has submitted a proposal to the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) asking for permission to incorporate staking rewards into its Ethereum exchange-traded fund (ETF) in a daring attempt to completely transform the cryptocurrency investment landscape.

By attempting to enter the growing Ethereum staking industry, this novel strategy can provide investors with higher returns on their capital. This approach could usher in a new era for cryptocurrency ETFs, combining classic investment methods with the cutting-edge technology of blockchain staking as the crypto industry impatiently awaits the SEC’s verdict.

Fidelity’s Proposal Details

The most recent endeavour from Fidelity is a calculated decision to incorporate rewards for staking into its Ethereum ETF, which can drastically alter the investing environment. Fidelity hopes to take advantage of the expanding Ethereum staking market by staking a percentage of the ETF’s Ethereum holdings, increasing investor profits. The plan describes how this procedure will be managed by enlisting trustworthy staking providers, potentially including Fidelity’s affiliates. This strategy fits the more significant trend of integrating blockchain technology into conventional financial products while diversifying the ETF’s revenue sources.

The cryptocurrency market was shaken by the news of Fidelity’s proposal for a staking-integrated ETF; this was especially true for Lido DAO, a significant participant in the Ethereum staking ecosystem. The price of Lido DAO’s token substantially increased after the announcement, rising 9% from $2.47 to $2.69. Nevertheless, the more significant market trends quickly caught up, and Lido DAO’s price reversed to $2.44. This price swing highlights how sensitive the market is to changes in ETFs and staking, underscoring how interwoven the cryptocurrency ecosystem is.

Challenges and Criticisms

Staking integration with ETFs poses several difficulties that have generated discussion in the investing industry. Opponents contend that this integration complicates the ETF’s structure and might discourage regulatory clearance. The regulatory environment is also viewed with scepticism since there are worries that the SEC’s decision-making process may become more complex because of the additional layer of staking. The community’s concern stems from the fear that these intricacies would make it more difficult to approve cutting-edge financial products like Fidelity’s Ethereum ETF.

Fidelity is not acting alone in its search for an Ethereum ETF with staking rewards. Staking integration into ETF products is being investigated by prominent names, including Ark 21Shares and Franklin Templeton, among the eight competitors fighting for SEC approval. This pattern suggests that financial institutions are becoming more aware of the potential advantages of staking regarding ETF yields. The race to introduce the first Ethereum ETF with staking integration is getting more intense, and each competitor is bringing different tactics.

Regulatory Hurdles

The SEC has repeatedly delayed making a decision, which has caused significant delays in the approval process for Fidelity’s Ethereum ETF. The regulatory environment becomes even more complex when staking is included in the ETF equation. The SEC is more closely examining Fidelity’s plan because of its worries about the possible hazards and regulatory difficulties of staking. The cryptocurrency community anxiously awaits the SEC’s final ruling, due May 23. They are speculating about the outcome and how it may affect Bitcoin investment products.

These legal barriers are required because of the unique way that staking works in the context of an ETF. To maintain network security and operations, staking—a procedure essential to the functioning of some blockchain networks—involves locking up digital assets in exchange for incentives. Staking, when incorporated into an ETF, brings a new set of risks and factors that regulators must carefully assess. These include the potential influence on market dynamics, the security of staked assets, and the fairness and openness of reward distribution.

The larger framework of Bitcoin regulation influences the SEC’s cautious stance. Cryptocurrencies pose special issues in terms of consumer protection, market integrity, and financial stability because they are a relatively new and quickly developing asset class. Any new financial product, like an ETF with staking integrated into it, must comply with strict guidelines set forth by the SEC to protect investors and the integrity of the financial markets.

Given this, it is possible to interpret the delays and scrutiny Fidelity’s Ethereum ETF proposal encountered as a component of the SEC’s more significant requirement to exercise caution when navigating the volatile and intricate regulatory environment around cryptocurrencies. Market players and regulators are entering unknown territory as the business continues to change, trying to strike a balance between innovation and strict regulation requirements.


Kelly has carved a niche in the dynamic world of Web3 over the past three years, combining her talents in marketing and writing to become a standout Web3 copywriter. Her journey in this innovative field is distinguished by her profound engagement with the decentralized technology landscape. Kelly’s creative prowess, coupled with her deep understanding of Web3, enables her to create compelling narratives that resonate deeply within the blockchain community. Beyond writing, Kelly’s marketing acumen has been instrumental in elevating various Web3 marketing projects, making them prominent in the realm of digital innovation.